This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The culprit: lax practices of a third-party data and analytics contractor. Related: Atrium Health breach highlights third-party risks. Third-party cyber risks are likely to persist at the current scale for a while longer. There is impetus for change – beyond the fear of sustaining a major databreach.
Many vendor claims are unclear as to what they’re promising in this space, but they are quite insistent that without Zero Trust network architectures, organizations are at great risk for databreaches and other network sabotage.
Recent breaches at Indiana University, Iowa State, the University of Maryland, and the University of North Dakota cumulatively impacted over 750,000 students, alumni, faculty and staff. In the case of higher educational institutions there is data exposure risk from personally identifiable information, such as social security numbers.
The end result of these types of cyber attacks are often highly public and damaging databreaches. 1 in 4 Americans reported that they would stop doing business with a company following a databreach, and 67% of consumers reported a loss of trust in an organization following a breach. What Are DataBreaches?
Our latest research into consumer behaviour has unearthed a conundrum: people knowingly take risks online even though they understand the dangers. On the one hand, we’ve got two out of three saying life is riskier now than it was five years ago, with serious concerns about losing data or being hacked.
Graham Cluley Blog Graham Cluley’s blog is a trusted source for cybersecurity insights, covering a wide range of topics including databreaches, malware threats, and compliance issues. It’s hands-down essential reading for compliance professionals seeking a broader understanding of cybersecurity issues.
A 2019 Ponemon study revealed that the cost of a databreach is $4.88 In recent years, there has been a global imperative for organizations to take better care of protecting customers -- whether it’s their data or their safety. In September 2017, Equifax faced a databreach. less than before its breach.
s not unusual to only consider the risks from your first-party code. In 2017, Equifax suffered a massive databreach from Apache Struts which compromised the data ??? Following the breach, Equifax's stock fell over 13 percent. When it comes to securing your applications, it???s But if you???re
Web applications offer a primary way in for attackers Source: Verizon 2024 DataBreach Investigations Report , Web applications were the number one ways-in vector, used in upwards of 60% of non-error, non-misuse breaches. This means they can miss security risks that traverse cloud and hybrid environments.
If we focus primarily on perimeter defense, we will continue to see databreaches and exposure to our critical infrastructure. The Vormetric Data Security Platform. With the Vormetric Data Security Platform, agencies can establish strong safeguards around sensitive data.
Do you ever get tired of those statements from companies after a databreach telling us: “we take your security seriously”? In a year of high-profile ransomware incidents and databreaches, security is near the top of the agenda as never before. What is it – and what is it not? It’s essentially split into two parts.
The obligation to report serious incidents or malfunctions recalls the obligation to notify databreaches. The volume collects the speeches made during the event organized by the Italian Data Protection Authority on artificial intelligence on the April 19-20, 2021. Eager to know more?
Without a solution that digs deeper, like a neighborhood watch keeping an eye on every entry point, organizations remain vulnerable to unmonitored risks. Protecting against third-party API risks requires monitoring within your application environment, not just at the perimeter.
Organizations are increasingly finding themselves caught in the “ security war of more ” where Governance, Risk and Compliance regimes, compounded by vendor solution fragmentation, have resulted in tick-box security. In order to win this battle, a structured and homogenous approach must be constructed across the industry.
Although a company's assessment can take various forms, it typically involves looking for the physical and digital risks that could pose threats and interfere with operations. This latest version replaces a whitepaper released in April 2020 that defined the SSDF. It came about after workshops and public input.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 28,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content