This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Lets explore the risks associated with Automated Driving. Safety First For Automated Driving " is a big, over-arching whitepaper from a dozen automotive manufacturers and suppliers. One of the "minimal risk" maneuvers listed (table 4) is an emergency stop. It's important to remember that driving is incredibly dangerous.
Many vendor claims are unclear as to what they’re promising in this space, but they are quite insistent that without Zero Trust network architectures, organizations are at great risk for data breaches and other network sabotage. The post WHITEPAPER: Authentication Does Not Equal Zero Trust appeared first on Security Boulevard.
“ Safety First For Automated Driving ” is a big, over-arching whitepaper from a dozen automotive manufacturers and suppliers. One of the “minimal risk” maneuvers listed (table 4) is an emergency stop. I also like Figure 27 & 28 (shown), showing risks associated with a generic architecture.
Today’s application architectures support fast, continuous innovation. Back end architectures use small, independent code modules called microservices. Clearly today’s application architectures use a lot of components, making them more complex, but the benefits run deep. Complexity breeds security risk. Trustworthy.
Companies have moved quickly to embrace cloud native applications and infrastructure to take advantage of cloud provider systems and to align their design decisions with cloud properties of scalability, resilience, and security first architectures.
We've confirmed that this proof-of-concept, or its variants, function across a variety of operating systems, processor architectures, and hardware generations. In 2019, the team responsible for V8, Chrome’s JavaScript engine, published a blog post and whitepaper concluding that such attacks can’t be reliably mitigated at the software level.
For businesses still using the broken SHA-1, they were facing serious risks , including: Increased possibility of a collision or man-in-the-middle attack. NIST has developed a whitepaper which outlines the steps for migration to post-quantum cryptography. Prepare a quantum-safe architecture now. Crypto-agility. Related Posts.
Instead, the best of breed functionality was purposefully reconstructed for SSE, using a microservices architecture that can scale elastically, and built on a platform-neutral stack that can run on bare metal and public cloud, equally effectively. From the start, the architecture was designed with zero trust in mind.
We published a whitepaper about Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs) and also tools utilized by the DarkSide threat actors. . Practice risk management for the worst case event. Practicing risk management for assets is important to estimate and understand possible outcomes in the event of a cyber attack. . References. [1]
In this blog we set out to see how choosing the correct security controls framework can go a long way in establishing a secure foundation, which then allows Enterprise security designers/decision makers to make more informed solution choices while selecting the controls and vendor architectures.
With more employees working remotely than ever before due to COVID-19, businesses are at greater risk from a cyber-attack with workers accessing systems outside of the usual company network. You can’t scrimp on discovery, but no standard risk assessment scales. Finally, embrace third party risk management.
Technologies like ARM's Memory Tagging Extension (MTE) and the Capability Hardware Enhanced RISC Instructions (CHERI) architecture offer a complementary defense, particularly for existing code. Businesses can procure memory-safe products with assurance, reducing their risk and protecting their customers.
Their project README has some information on the background of the project in their own words, and the following resources give some more information on this awesome project: blog post , whitepaper , Black Hat USA slides , BlackHat USA presentation. Revoke-Obfuscation and this post stick purely to the obfuscation detection problem.
Our imaginary supermarket architecture consists of: A main supermarket store. So, if we apply this to our analogy, we could class this data as low risk. However, would you react the same way if a single piece of low-risk data is affected (i.e. The core of our analogy will be comparing supermarket stock to a business’s data.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 28,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content