This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Built on an identity-centric framework for security, Zero Trust completely transforms both current and legacy IT models. My experience implementing Zero Trust has shown me that, while the process to implement a complete architecture takes time, the transformation is worth the effort and the benefits will be realized throughout the journey.
But, as traditional infrastructure evolves to a mix of bare metal, virtual, cloud, and container environments, security teams are increasingly finding it challenging to keep up with the shifting risks, compliance requirements, tools, and architectural changes introduced by new technologies.
But it is vital as they fight for cybersecurity budget, try to explain risk, and explain the importance of line items such as securityawareness training, blue, red and purple team exercises, and more. That's a soft skill that even the most adept CISOs are still trying to master.
He is responsible for providing policy and governance oversight and research, third-party vendor guidance, proactive vulnerability research and threat modeling services, payment card and financial systems security, and security research to IU Health and IU School of Medicine. He was also director of the SANS Internet Storm Center.
"The IT security was being done with excellence, so we were going to leave that going while we assessed our strategy, and the operational responsibilities would come later.". Security is now a programmatic, or an automatic, part of evaluating a technology the university would like to utilize.
Here’s what they had to say, edited for clarity and length: Vikram Asnani, senior director – solution architecture, CyberGRX. Dom Glavach, CSO and chief strategist, CyberSN. Chris Clements, VP of solutions architecture, Cerberus Sentinel. Gary Phipps, VP of solution architecture, CyberGRX.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 28,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content