This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
“It took nearly 11 months (328 days) to identity and contain data breaches resulting from stolen or compromised credentials.” – IBM’s Cost of Data Breach Report 2023 I recently came across a 2012 article from CSO Online , and realized that it has been more than 11 years since the phrase “Identity is the new perimeter” was coined!
Note that this blog was informed by my observations of the previous wave of security data lakes ( dating back to 2012 ) and related attempts by organizations to build security data science capabilities. So, in 2012, we said : “Finally, “collect once?—?analyze However, we are not living in 2012 or 2018 anymore?—?we So, has it?
despite “output-driven SIEM” concept having been invented before 2012 (to be honest, I stole the idea from a Vigilant consultant back in 2012). Note that some of the rules/content may be created by the tool vendor while the rest is created by the customer. What data do we collect?” tends to predate “what do we actually want to do?”
Anton’s old SIEM presentation from 2012. source , date: 2012). The mission also evolved a lot over the years from alert aggregation to compliance and reporting to threatdetection and response support. You want to have easier threatdetection in cloud environments. examples , examples , examples.
Anton’s old SIEM presentation from 2012 ( source , date: 2012) Before we go, we need to separate the SIEM tool operation difficulties from the SIEM mission difficulties. The mission also evolved a lot over the years from alert aggregation to compliance and reporting to threatdetection and response support.
In 2012, there was just one CVE, whereas in 2023, there were 42 CVEs. This significant rise had a notable impact on our product, influencing its detection. Recently, we extended these capabilities, launching a new, multi-layered OAuth protection package that can detect attempts to exploit OAuth and proactively fix vulnerabilities.
I lamented on this back in 2012 , and this affliction has not truly subsided. Finally, the tool may “scale physically, but not economically” i.e. it will run at scale you need, but nobody can realistically afford it … Tool deployed and then not operationalized sounds like a process failure, or a people failure.
Note that this blog was informed by my observations of the previous wave of security data lakes ( dating back to 2012 ) and related attempts by organizations to build security data science capabilities. So, in 2012, we said : “Finally, “collect once?—?analyze However, we are not living in 2012 or 2018 anymore?—?we So, has it?
A woman speaking on a mobile phone walks past a cloud computing presentation ahead of the CeBIT technology trade fair in 2012. For complete cloud security an organization should encrypt data to protect it in the cloud and also implement real-time threatdetection and response.”. Sean Gallup/Getty Images).
Cobalt Strike was first released in 2012 to address perceived gaps in an existing Red Team tool, the Metasploit Framework. By 2016, Proofpoint observed Cobalt being used by threat actors. In December 2020, the Cobalt Strike Beacon was discovered to be one of the tools Russian-based threat actors used in the SolarWinds hack.
The cybersecurity startup offers an extended detection and response (XDR) solution that tracks network traffic and automatically combines the information with machine-comprehended threatdetection. Best ThreatDetection Startups. Venture Cybereason 2012 Boston, MA 1,100 $713.6 Acquired by JFrog.
Started in 2012, Vectra already stands out among the NDR marketplace, offering managed detection and response (MDR) and its threatdetection and response platform. Companies have plenty of integrations to choose from for tools like EDR, SIEM, threat intelligence, and Secure Access Service Edge (SASE).
Its first appearance as a Leader on the Gartner MQ for SIEM was in 2012. Cloud is super-fast, offers inexpensive storage, and instantaneous search, and can integrate a threatdetection engine that can catch bad actors, including the majority who are now breaking in with valid credentials.
despite “output-driven SIEM” concept having been invented before 2012 (to be honest, I stole the idea from a Vigilant consultant back in 2012). Note that some of the rules/content may be created by the tool vendor while the rest is created by the customer. What data do we collect?” tends to predate “what do we actually want to do?”
Cobalt Strike was first released in 2012 to address perceived gaps in an existing Red Team tool, the Metasploit Framework. By 2016, Proofpoint observed Cobalt being used by threat actors. In December 2020, the Cobalt Strike Beacon was discovered to be one of the tools Russian-based threat actors used in the SolarWinds hack.
Exabeam Fusion is the company’s threatdetection, investigation, and response (TDIR) solution bringing together automated , next-generation SIEM and XDR capabilities. Beyond centralized log management, Exabeam Fusion includes a stack of security features to aid in an era of advanced threats. Exabeam Fusion.
It is definitely more 2012 than 2022, but there are still organizations that are trying to operate like this. My favorite example is threatdetection in the cloud where working together with the provider on certain tasks rather than debating separate responsibilities is perhaps the only route to success (another example ).
Other features include auditing, activity monitoring, threatdetection, and more. Started in 1995, Trustwave prides itself on their advanced threatdetection and managed security service (MSSP) product offerings. To secure applications, Azure offers granular, row level security tied to users and dynamic data masking.
In 2012, Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) began to emerge to monitor user access of cloud services. Effective security monitoring and threatdetection are made possible by comprehensive insights into cloud workloads, including configuration, software inventory, network connections, and user access rights.
Founded in 2012, Versa Networks seeks to deploy a single software operating system, called VOS, to converge and integrate cloud and on-premises security, networking, and analytics. Who is Versa Networks? Using VOS, Versa enables customers and service providers to deploy SASE and software-defined wide area network (SD-WAN) solutions.
It is definitely more 2012 than 2022, but there are still organizations that are trying to operate like this. My favorite example is threatdetection in the cloud where working together with the provider on certain tasks rather than debating separate responsibilities is perhaps the only route to success (another example ).
I lamented on this back in 2012 , and this affliction has not truly subsided. Finally, the tool may “scale physically, but not economically” i.e. it will run at scale you need, but nobody can realistically afford it …. Tool deployed and then not operationalized sounds like a process failure, or a people failure.
Threatdetection based on the latest threat intelligence and user-specific contextual data. First defined by Gartner in 2012, they add CASBs “ interject enterprise security policies as the cloud-based resources are accessed.” Deployment options for integrating with SOAR, IAM, and cloud-service APIs.
APT41 APT41 (aka Wicked Panda, BARIUM, Wicked Spider) is a Chinese state-affiliated threat group active since 2012. It is a versatile threat group, engaged in both cyber-espionage—likely supporting Chinese government interests—and financially motivated attacks.
APT41 APT41 (aka Wicked Panda, BARIUM, Wicked Spider) is a Chinese state-affiliated threat group active since 2012. It is a versatile threat group, engaged in both cyber-espionage—likely supporting Chinese government interests—and financially motivated attacks.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 28,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content