This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In most cases, my instinctive reaction was to argue with them, because I very clearly saw “SIEM” (or pieces of SIEM ) in what they showed me … Admittedly, my thinking has been colored by SIEM since 2002 when I joined my first SIEM vendor (a SIM vendor, to be precise).
you trust the SIEM to map the events to the correct category and not to confuse “password guessing” with “logon failure” or whatever You then trust that the detection logic (rules) is written correctly so that nobody mistyped “context.asset.vulnerability.severity” as “asset.context.vulnerability.severity” in a rule they wrote.
Otherwise, 30+ years of SOC work and we’re still facing the age-old challenges we had in the past (believe it or not, “too many [IDS] alerts” was a SOC challenge in 2002!). We think that the largest current and future challenges in Security Operations can be solved with this approach.
And let me tell you … that “n” is pretty damn large since my first involvement with SIEM in January 2002 (!)?—? The mission also evolved a lot over the years from alert aggregation to compliance and reporting to threatdetection and response support. You want to have easier threatdetection in cloud environments.
And let me tell you … that “n” is pretty damn large since my first involvement with SIEM in January 2002 (!)?—? The mission also evolved a lot over the years from alert aggregation to compliance and reporting to threatdetection and response support. Let’s explore this topic for the (n+1)-th time. examples , examples , examples.
To put this in perspective, it took a group of 300,000 people and four years of work to crack a 64-bit key in 2002. Implement managed threatdetection. The best way to ensure that your cybersecurity ecosystem remains intact is to implement managed threatdetection through a trusted company.
Related posts: “Detection as Code? No, Detection as COOKING!” “How How to Measure ThreatDetection Quality for an Organization?” As we learned , SIEM still matters in 2023.
Additional database security products include the IBM Cloud Pak for investigating and remediating cloud security events, and IBM Security QRadar is a cloud-enabled threat immobilizer. Other features include auditing, activity monitoring, threatdetection, and more. Read our in-depth review of IBM Guardium.
Admittedly, my thinking has been colored by SIEM since 2002 when I joined my first SIEM vendor (a SIM vendor, to be precise). Now, in this alternative world, what if you set out to invent the best technology to analyze various types of telemetry for threatdetection and response ( rather than to reinvent SIEM )?
If there is a taxonomy (wow, much 2002 SIEM!), You then trust that the detection logic (rules) is written correctly so that nobody mistyped “context.asset.vulnerability.severity” as “asset.context.vulnerability.severity” in a rule they wrote.
Otherwise, 30+ years of SOC work and we’re still facing the age-old challenges we had in the past (believe it or not, “too many [IDS] alerts” was a SOC challenge in 2002!). We think that the largest current and future challenges in Security Operations can be solved with this approach. New Paper: “Autonomic Security Operations?
Launched in 2002 and specializing in wireless networking , Aruba Networks’ success led to its acquisition by Hewlett-Packard in 2015. Top SD-WAN Solutions for Enterprise Cybersecurity. Aruba Barracuda Networks Cato Networks Cisco Fortinet Juniper Networks Open Systems Palo Alto Networks Versa Networks VMware. How Does SD-WAN Work?
Also Read: Advanced ThreatDetection Buying Guide. Advanced Threat Defense. Luckily, this anti-analysis feature is resolvable by ensuring the sandbox environment resembles a typical computer system. This means configuring the sandbox to contain faux programs and files that won’t be missed if corrupted in the process. Proofpoint.
Some even date back to 2002. We promptly apply a patch or remediate the issue, and the problem goes away. In the real world, over 63% of all reported unpatched vulnerabilities are at least two years old. Why is this? Why do so many organizations put themselves and their customers at risk by neglecting longstanding and known flaws?
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 28,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content